Continue

← Back to All AI Tools

1. Should you try Continue? Overview

What it is ai-productivity-data / Dev
Country / HQ Open source (USA)
Best for Developers wanting model freedom (Claude for chat, Qwen-local for complete)
Check before buying Watch out: Zero-config seekers (→ Cursor/Copilot)
Editor rating 4.5 / 5
Pricing signal Free tier + paid from $3/mo

2. Features What it does

Feature What it does
Chat Sidebar chat, @codebase @files @docs @terminal @web context providers — Multi-model switch in-panel
Autocomplete Inline single/multiline, separate autocomplete model (e.g. Qwen-Coder 7B local) — Quality = model-dependent
Edit Highlight + natural-language diff, Apply to file — VS Code sidebar / JB inline popup
Agent Autonomous plan→edit→terminal→verify, background agents (PR review, doc drafts) — Less mature than Cursor Composer/Devin
MCP stdio / SSE / streamable-http, config in ~/.continue/config.yaml or .continue/mcpServers/ — Linear/GitLab/Playwright/Atlassian etc.
Rules PR/security/Docker/Rust/React/Pandas rule packs — Reusable prompt policy
Local/offline Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp, vLLM; .continue/dev_data/ local only — Air-gapped capable
Surface VS Code (2.4M+ installs), JetBrains (IntelliJ/PyCharm/WebStorm/GoLand/etc.), Neovim (community), CLI — JB plugin community-maintained parity lag
Enterprise (Hub) Centralized config, secret mgmt, allowed-models/allowed-MCP, Team/Company Hub, SSO (Ent) — No code sent to Continue servers unless cloud model chosen
No No bundled model, no flat subscription for model access, no mobile/web editor, no zero-config for beginners — You pay LLM vendor directly

3. Pricing Pricing (2026-10, USD)

Plan Price / mo Key limits & who it fits
Core (OSS) $0 (Apache 2.0) Extension free; you pay LLM API or $0 if local Ollama
Continue Hub — Starter Usage-based (~$3 / Mtok) Managed context/agents, optional
Continue Hub — Team $20/seat/mo $10 credit/seat incl, shared agents, central config, key mgmt, CI/PR automation
Enterprise Custom SSO/SAML, BYOK, audit, on-prem data plane, SLAs
Effective solo cost 0–100/mo Light ~<20,moderate20–40, heavy frontier-model 50–100+,local0

4. Integration Access & integrations

Access type Details
VS Code extension Yes (primary)
JetBrains plugin Yes (IntelliJ/PyCharm/WebStorm/GoLand/Rider/etc.)
Neovim Community configs
CLI continue CLI for background agents
Config ~/.continue/config.json / config.yaml, .continue/mcpServers/*.yaml
Models Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini, DeepSeek, Qwen, Together, Mistral, Azure OA, Ollama, LM Studio
MCP servers Linear, GitLab, Playwright, Atlassian, Sentry, Snyk, Context7, custom
Auth BYO API key / local token; Hub adds team secret layer
No No web app, no mobile, no REST public “gen code” API

5. Reviews & Sources External reviews

Source Rating What it says
ToolChase 4.7/5 Wins on openness/cost/model freedom
Aggregate community ~4.3/5 (GitHub 25k★) JetBrains+MCP+local LLM unique combo
Trustpilot n/a (OSS, no vendor acct) —
Complaints cluster — Config overhead, agent mode < Cursor/Claude Code, autocomplete varies with model, JB plugin lags VS Code, doc lag

6. Best for / Not for Fit

✔ Suitable ✘ Not suitable
• Developers wanting model freedom (Claude for chat, Qwen-local for complete)
• JetBrains-heavy shops (only OSS MCP-capable JB plugin)
• Air-gapped / regulated / proprietary-code orgs (Ollama offline)
• Cost-conscious solo devs (local model = $0)
• OSS enthusiasts / custom agent builders
• Zero-config seekers (→ Cursor/Copilot)
• Teams wanting bundled model + flat bill
• Non-technical users unwilling to edit YAML
• Heavy frontier-model autocomplete users (bill > Cursor $20)
• Autonomous ticket-solver needs (→ Devin/Claude Code)

7. Competitors How it compares

Competitor How it differs Best for
AI-first editor Cursor Cursor $20 flat bundled, better agent; Continue free+OSS+JB+MCP+local
Assistant (editor plugin) GitHub Copilot Copilot $10 flat, zero-config; Continue BYOK/local only
OSS agent (VS Code) Cline / Roo Code Cline agent deeper; Continue chat/edit/MCP broader, JB support
Autocomplete priv Tabnine Tabnine hosted priv; Continue local-but-you-wire-it
Enterprise code-graph Sourcegraph Cody Cody cross-repo SCIP; Continue context-providers lighter
AWS-native Amazon Q Developer (sunsetting) Q Console-native; Continue model-agnostic
JB native JetBrains AI Assistant JB AI has Junie+frontier; Continue OSS+local+MCP
In-list overlap Exa, Cody, Q Dev, JB AI, Voicemod/PixVerse/Synthesia/AIVA — no audio/video overlap

8. Summary Verdict

Who should pick it Developers wanting model freedom (Claude for chat, Qwen-local for complete)
Who should skip it Zero-config seekers (→ Cursor/Copilot)
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Cookie Settings