Consensus
← Back to All AI Tools1. Should you try Consensus? Overview
| What it is | AI research search engine |
| Country / HQ | Boston, USA |
| Best for | Answering research questions with cited academic papers |
| Check before buying | Type a question in plain English (e.g. ‘does X improve Y?’) on the free tier to see cited claims. |
| Pricing signal | Free tier + paid from $20/mo |
2. Features What it does
| Feature | What it does |
|---|---|
| 220M+ papers | Searches a large corpus of peer-reviewed research. |
| Cited answers | Returns claims backed by studies, with links and evidence grades. |
| Deep Research | Runs multi-step literature reviews on a question. |
| Study snapshots | Summarises what a paper found and how strong the evidence is. |
| API & MCP | Embed research search into apps and AI agents. |
3. Pricing Pricing (2026-10, USD)
| Plan | Price / mo | Key limits & who it fits |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Oct 2026 ~20 searches, 10 Pro messages, 3 Deep reviews, 30 API/MCP calls |
| Pro | $20/mo ($12 annual) | Oct 2026 Higher search and message limits, deep reviews |
| Deep | $65/mo ($45 annual) | Oct 2026 Unlimited deep research and highest limits |
| Teams | $30/seat/mo | Oct 2026 Shared workspace for research teams |
| Enterprise | Custom | Oct 2026 Volume, SSO, custom corpus access |
Type a question in plain English (e.g. ‘does X improve Y?’) on the free tier to see cited claims.
4. Integration Access & integrations
| Access type | Details |
|---|---|
| Web | and iOS apps, plus a browser extension. |
| API | and MCP server for embedding into workflows and agents. |
| Citations | link out to the underlying papers. |
5. Reviews & Sources External reviews
| Source | Rating | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial | Researcher favourite | Praised for saving literature-review time with real citations. |
| Students | Positive | Loved for quick, sourced answers over a topic. |
| Community | Growing | Strong word-of-mouth among academics and analysts. |
6. Best for / Not for Fit
| ✔ Suitable | ✘ Not suitable |
|---|---|
| • Students, researchers and analysts who need evidence-backed answers fast. | • Reading full papers behind paywalls – it summarises and cites, it is not a full-text library. |
7. Competitors How it compares
| Competitor | How it differs | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Elicit | Elicit automates literature reviews with table extraction. | Choose Elicit for structured extraction across many papers. |
| Scite | Scite shows how papers cite and contrast each other. | Choose Scite for citation-context analysis. |
| Semantic Scholar | Semantic Scholar is a free academic search with AI features. | Choose Semantic Scholar for free, broad paper search. |
| Google Scholar | Google Scholar is the free, comprehensive paper index. | Choose Google Scholar as the free baseline everyone uses. |
| ResearchRabbit | ResearchRabbit maps paper networks and recommendations. | Choose ResearchRabbit for visual citation mapping. |
| Perplexity | Perplexity is a general AI search with some citations. | Choose Perplexity for general questions beyond academia. |
| Jenni | Jenni is an AI writing assistant for academic papers. | Choose Jenni when the job is writing the paper, not just finding evidence. |
8. Summary Verdict
| Takeaway | Consensus turns the dreaded literature review into a few minutes of cited, evidence-graded answers, which is why students and analysts love it. It will not replace reading the actual papers for a thesis, but for scoping a topic or checking whether the evidence supports a claim it is superb. |
| Who should pick it | Students, researchers and analysts who need evidence-backed answers fast. |
| Who should skip it | Reading full papers behind paywalls – it summarises and cites, it is not a full-text library. |
Event history
- 2024-11 Active — Independent, active Source
