Miro
← Back to All AI Tools1. Should you try Miro? Overview
| What it is | Miro is a collaborative visual whiteboard platform for brainstorming, diagramming, workshops and async teamwork, with AI features for clustering, summarizing and generating content. |
| Country / HQ | San Francisco, California, USA (founded 2011, Amsterdam roots) |
| Best for | Distributed teams running workshops, sprint planning and visual collaboration. |
| Check before buying | Best AI and advanced features need paid tiers; board performance can slow with very large boards. |
| Editor rating | 4.5 / 5 |
| Pricing signal | Free tier + paid |
2. Features What it does
| Feature | What it does |
|---|---|
| Infinite canvas | Sticky notes, shapes, connectors and frames on a shared board. |
| Miro AI | Generate diagrams, summarize stickies, cluster ideas and create images. |
| Templates | Thousands of templates for retros, roadmaps and workshops. |
| Integrations | Jira, Asana, Slack, Teams, Figma and 150+ apps. |
| Talktrack | Guided async walkthroughs of boards. |
| Video and talk | Embedded video, timer and voting for live sessions. |
| Enterprise governance | SSO, admin controls and data residency options. |
3. Pricing Pricing (2026-10, USD)
| Plan | Price / mo | Key limits & who it fits |
|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | 3 editable boards, unlimited members, core widgets. |
| Starter | ~$8/user/mo (annual) | Unlimited boards, private boards, high-res exports. |
| Business | ~$16/user/mo (annual) | Advanced sharing, sides+ talktrack, estimates. |
| Enterprise | Custom | SSO, domain control, enterprise support. |
Prices fluctuate by region and billing period; verify at miro.com.
4. Integration Access & integrations
| Access type | Details |
|---|---|
| Work management | Jira, Asana, Monday, Azure DevOps. |
| Communication | Slack, Teams, Zoom. |
| Design | Figma import, Adobe XD. |
| Platform | Web, desktop and mobile apps. |
5. Reviews & Sources External reviews
| Source | Rating | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| G2 | 4.8 / 5 | One of the highest-rated collaboration tools; speed at scale is the main gripe. |
| Capterra | 4.7 / 5 | Praised for workshop facilitation. |
| Enterprise users | Positive | Widely adopted as the standard visual collaboration canvas. |
6. Best for / Not for Fit
| ✔ Suitable | ✘ Not suitable |
|---|---|
| • Remote and hybrid team workshops • Product discovery and sprint planning • Consulting and education sessions |
• Heavy document management • Offline-first work • Single users needing only note-taking |
7. Competitors How it compares
| Competitor | How it differs | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| FigJam | FigJam pairs with Figma design; Miro is broader for workshops. | Figma-centric teams. |
| Mural | Mural focuses on facilitation; Miro wins ecosystem and templates. | Facilitator-led sessions. |
| Lucidspark | Lucidspark pairs with Lucidchart diagramming depth. | Diagram-heavy teams. |
8. Summary Verdict
| Takeaway | The default visual collaboration canvas for teams, now with useful AI for clustering and synthesis. |
| Who should pick it | Teams that think visually and meet remotely. |
| Who should skip it | Solo users or orgs needing doc-centric collaboration. |
