Miro

← Back to All AI Tools

1. Should you try Miro? Overview

What it is Miro is a collaborative visual whiteboard platform for brainstorming, diagramming, workshops and async teamwork, with AI features for clustering, summarizing and generating content.
Country / HQ San Francisco, California, USA (founded 2011, Amsterdam roots)
Best for Distributed teams running workshops, sprint planning and visual collaboration.
Check before buying Best AI and advanced features need paid tiers; board performance can slow with very large boards.
Editor rating 4.5 / 5
Pricing signal Free tier + paid

2. Features What it does

Feature What it does
Infinite canvas Sticky notes, shapes, connectors and frames on a shared board.
Miro AI Generate diagrams, summarize stickies, cluster ideas and create images.
Templates Thousands of templates for retros, roadmaps and workshops.
Integrations Jira, Asana, Slack, Teams, Figma and 150+ apps.
Talktrack Guided async walkthroughs of boards.
Video and talk Embedded video, timer and voting for live sessions.
Enterprise governance SSO, admin controls and data residency options.

3. Pricing Pricing (2026-10, USD)

Plan Price / mo Key limits & who it fits
Free $0 3 editable boards, unlimited members, core widgets.
Starter ~$8/user/mo (annual) Unlimited boards, private boards, high-res exports.
Business ~$16/user/mo (annual) Advanced sharing, sides+ talktrack, estimates.
Enterprise Custom SSO, domain control, enterprise support.

Prices fluctuate by region and billing period; verify at miro.com.

4. Integration Access & integrations

Access type Details
Work management Jira, Asana, Monday, Azure DevOps.
Communication Slack, Teams, Zoom.
Design Figma import, Adobe XD.
Platform Web, desktop and mobile apps.

5. Reviews & Sources External reviews

Source Rating What it says
G2 4.8 / 5 One of the highest-rated collaboration tools; speed at scale is the main gripe.
Capterra 4.7 / 5 Praised for workshop facilitation.
Enterprise users Positive Widely adopted as the standard visual collaboration canvas.

6. Best for / Not for Fit

✔ Suitable ✘ Not suitable
• Remote and hybrid team workshops
• Product discovery and sprint planning
• Consulting and education sessions
• Heavy document management
• Offline-first work
• Single users needing only note-taking

7. Competitors How it compares

Competitor How it differs Best for
FigJam FigJam pairs with Figma design; Miro is broader for workshops. Figma-centric teams.
Mural Mural focuses on facilitation; Miro wins ecosystem and templates. Facilitator-led sessions.
Lucidspark Lucidspark pairs with Lucidchart diagramming depth. Diagram-heavy teams.

8. Summary Verdict

Takeaway The default visual collaboration canvas for teams, now with useful AI for clustering and synthesis.
Who should pick it Teams that think visually and meet remotely.
Who should skip it Solo users or orgs needing doc-centric collaboration.
Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Cookie Settings